http://hdl.handle.net/11422/79 2026-07-25T21:33:09Z 2026-07-25T21:33:09Z http://hdl.handle.net/11422/29731 2026-07-22T03:00:14Z 2024-12-12T00:00:00Z

Title: Garantia de direitos previdenciários no regime estatutário: riscos da privatização obrigatória (EC 103/2019) e das crises cíclicas do capital Author(s)/Inventor(s): Pepler, Wilk Barbosa Advisor: Bolonha, Carlos Alberto Pereira das Neves Abstract: The purpose of this master's thesis is to reflect on the history, dynamics and consequences of the mandatory establishment of a private pension scheme for statutory public servants of all federative entities. The paper aims to analyze how this mandatory institution of private pensions, as determined by Constitutional Amendment 103 of November 12, 2019, can guarantee (or not) the fundamental social security rights of statutory civil servants? To do so, it articulates categories such as social security, the capitalist state, neoliberalism and cyclical crises of capitalism. It seeks to understand how the Social Security Reforms took place in Brazil, their relationship with the functioning of the capitalist mode of production and its cyclical crises, how the privatization of social security contradicts fundamental social security rights, following the example of the problems faced in other countries, as well as the limits and possibilities of affirming social rights. The study will be carried out using bibliographical and documentary techniques, i.e. historical, sociological, economic and legal books, statistical data, documents, magazines, articles and electronic research on the problem in question. The multiple fields of knowledge will favor a dialectical and a realist approach in the legal and socio-historical critical interdisciplinary field. Publisher: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Type: Dissertação

2024-12-12T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11422/29730 2026-07-22T03:00:13Z 2024-12-17T00:00:00Z

Title: Juventude e punição: uma análise dos sistemas de pensamento presentes nas práticas e discursos dos profissionais envolvidos na execução das medidas socioeducativas em meio aberto no município do Rio de Janeiro Author(s)/Inventor(s): Costa, Taynara Gagliano Vieira Garavello da Advisor: Guerra, Sidney Cesar Silva Abstract: This work focuses on the complex issue of children in situations of serious and widespread human rights violations in Venezuela, and who move unaccompanied to Brazil in search of refuge. Upon entering the territory of the state of Roraima, these children become under the guardianship of the Brazilian State, which must provide the necessary protection, so that their previously violated rights are reestablished. As this is a specific and very recent migratory flow, the question arises: have the measures adopted by the Brazilian State proven to be sufficient to reestablish security and promote family reunification of these unaccompanied children? Are the legal standards used to safeguard refugees being properly observed in favor of these children? If not, could a legal measure be adopted within current legal regulations that would better meet the peculiar reality of unaccompanied children originating from Venezuela? Publisher: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Type: Dissertação

2024-12-17T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11422/29728 2026-07-22T03:00:14Z 2024-12-17T00:00:00Z

Title: Juventude e punição: uma análise dos sistemas de pensamento presentes nas práticas e discursos dos profissionais envolvidos na execução das medidas socioeducativas em meio aberto no município do Rio de Janeiro Author(s)/Inventor(s): Moura, Tássya Moura Advisor: Xavier, José Roberto Franco Abstract: This research aims to analyze the systems of ideas relating to the punishment of youth expressed in the practices and speeches issued by professionals responsible for implementing socio-educational measures in an open environment, in the city of Rio de Janeiro. As specific objectives, we intend to: I) understand the systems of ideas in dispute in the implementation of socio-educational measures in an open environment, as well as the tensions between laws, practices and discourses involving their implementation; II) understand which criteria are expressed in the speeches of professionals directly involved in carrying out measurements in an open environment to justify the replacement of measurements in an open environment with measurements in a closed environment, as well as the extension of their time period; III) understand which alternative ideas to punishment/sanction are presented by the operators of the measures in an open environment; IV) understand how theories of punishment are expressed in the speeches of professionals who work in the execution of measures in an open environment; V) understand how these professionals conceive the ideas of: why to punish, who to punish, how to punish and the scale of punishment. This is empirical, qualitative research, with a conventional structure and sampling from multiple cases of social micro-units. Participant observation and semi-structured interviews will be used as research instruments. The operational sample is expected to carry out 23 interviews covering the following professional categories: pedagogues, social workers, psychologists and legal practitioners (magistrate, public defender and prosecutor). The results point to an increasingly closer relationship between juvenile justice and adult criminal justice, expressed in what is known as Modern Penal Rationality (RPM). Contrary to what was imagined with the promulgation of the ECA, what the analysis of empirical data demonstrates is that, with regard to the ideas of who to punish, why to punish, how to punish and scale of punishment, the system of ideas prevalent in practices and discourses of professionals involved in the implementation of socio-educational measures in an open environment express not only the guarantor system of ideas, provided for in the ECA, but are also intertwined - often even in a contradictory way - with theories of punishment, typical of the adult criminal justice system (Theory of deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and denunciation). Publisher: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Type: Dissertação

2024-12-17T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11422/29726 2026-07-22T03:00:13Z 2024-05-10T00:00:00Z

Title: Conflitos coletivos de trabalho e a recepção da greve na educação pública pelo direito: estudo do caso-referência do Sindicato dos Servidores do Colégio Pedro II (SINDSCOPE) Author(s)/Inventor(s): Reis, Stella Mendes de Castro Advisor: Coutinho, Sayonara Grillo Abstract: The object of this dissertation is to study the manifestations of conflicts in labour relations in the public education sector and their absorption by the law in the strikes of the Pedro II College Workers' Union (SINDSCOPE). It investigates the legal treatment given by the Judiciary to strikes in the public education sector. Based on the critical socio-legal method, it uses the strikes organised by SINDSCOPE as a reference case for analysis. Using pluralist conceptions as a theoretical reference, empirical research is carried out, with a survey of data, including an analysis of strike lawsuits and field records. It examines the main theoretical-argumentative disputes observed and the decisions made by the judging bodies. It was observed that the main disputes are around jurisdictional competence, the cutting off of striking workers' time and the confrontation between the fundamental rights to strike and to education. Among the findings of the research were the different decision-making patterns between the State and Federal Courts regarding restrictions on the exercise of the right to strike. Publisher: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Type: Dissertação

2024-05-10T00:00:00Z